Protests 174566-G of Stern Bros.
This text of 3 Cust. Ct. 476 (Protests 174566-G of Stern Bros.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion by
In accordance with stipulation of counsel filet lace articles similar to those the subject of United States v. Jabara (22 C. C. P. A. 77, T. D. 47065), Normandy lace articles like those passed upon in United States v. Amrein (26 C. C. P. A. 353, C. A. D. 40), and embroidered bedspreads, tidies, and other articles similar to those the subject of Pustet v. United States (13 Ct. Cust. Appls. 530, T. D. 41396) were held dutiable at 75 percent under paragraph [477]*4771430 as claimed. Artificial flowers were held dutiable at 60 percent under paragraph 1419 on the authority of Robinson-Goodman v. United States (17 C. C. P. A. 149, T. D. 43473).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
3 Cust. Ct. 476, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/protests-174566-g-of-stern-bros-cusc-1939.