Protests 174565-G of Stern Bros.

3 Cust. Ct. 461
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedOctober 26, 1939
DocketNo. 42572
StatusPublished

This text of 3 Cust. Ct. 461 (Protests 174565-G of Stern Bros.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Protests 174565-G of Stern Bros., 3 Cust. Ct. 461 (cusc 1939).

Opinion

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel filet lace articles, Normandy lace articles, and embroidered handkerchiefs were held dutiable at 75 percent under paragraph 1430. United States v. Jabara (22 C. C. P. A. 77, T. D. 47065), United States v. Amrein (26 C. C. P. A. 353, C. A. D. 40), and Pustet. United States (13 Ct. Cust. Appls. 530, T. D. 41396) followed. Artificial flowers like those the subject of Robinson-Goodman v. United States (17 C. C. P. A. 149, T. D. 43473) were held dutiable at 60 percent under paragraph 1419.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Pustet v. United States
13 Ct. Cust. 530 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1926)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
3 Cust. Ct. 461, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/protests-174565-g-of-stern-bros-cusc-1939.