Protests 174565-G of Stern Bros.

U.S. Customs Court

Protests 174565-G of Stern Bros.

3 Cust. Ct. 461

United States Customs Court·Decided October 26, 1939·No. No. 42572·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel filet lace articles, Normandy lace articles, and embroidered handkerchiefs were held dutiable at 75 percent under paragraph 1430. United States v. Jabara (22 C. C. P. A. 77, T. D. 47065), United States v. Amrein (26 C. C. P. A. 353, C. A. D. 40), and Pustet. United States (13 Ct. Cust. Appls. 530, T. D. 41396) followed. Artificial flowers like those the subject of Robinson-Goodman v. United States (17 C. C. P. A. 149, T. D. 43473) were held dutiable at 60 percent under paragraph 1419.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel filet lace articles, Normandy lace articles, and embroidered handkerchiefs were held dutiable at 75 percent under paragraph 1430. United States v. Jabara (22 C. C. P. A. 77, T. D. 47065), United States v. Amrein (26 C. C. P. A. 353, C. A. D. 40), and Pustet. United States (13 Ct. Cust. Appls. 530, T. D. 41396) followed. Artificial flowers like those the subject of Robinson-Goodman v. United States (17 C. C. P. A. 149, T. D. 43473) were held dutiable at 60 percent under paragraph 1419.

Protests 174565-G of Stern Bros., 3 Cust. Ct. 461 (cusc 1939).

Pincite

3 Cust. Ct. 461 (Protests 174565-G of Stern Bros.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related