Protests 171527-G of Kargere

U.S. Customs Court

Protests 171527-G of Kargere

2 Cust. Ct. 665

United States Customs Court·Decided April 17, 1939·No. No. 41071·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel the merchandise in question was held dutiable as follows: (1) articles and fabrics in chief value of artificial silk the same as those passed upon in Abstract 37230 at 60 percent under paragraph 31; (2) embroidered articles at 75 percent under paragraph 1430, Glemby’s Sons v. United States (13 Ct. Cust. Appls. 533, T. D. 41397) followed; and (3) straw hats the same as those the subject of Stern v. United States (12 id. 514, T. D. 40701) at 50 percent under paragraph 1406.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel the merchandise in question was held dutiable as follows: (1) articles and fabrics in chief value of artificial silk the same as those passed upon in Abstract 37230 at 60 percent under paragraph 31; (2) embroidered articles at 75 percent under paragraph 1430, Glemby’s Sons v. United States (13 Ct. Cust. Appls. 533, T. D. 41397) followed; and (3) straw hats the same as those the subject of Stern v. United States (12 id. 514, T. D. 40701) at 50 percent under paragraph 1406.

Protests 171527-G of Kargere, 2 Cust. Ct. 665 (cusc 1939).

Pincite

2 Cust. Ct. 665 (Protests 171527-G of Kargere) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related