Protests 171527-G of Kargere

U.S. Customs Court

Protests 171527-G of Kargere

2 Cust. Ct. 665

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedApril 17, 1939

DocketNo. 41071

StatusPublished

This text of 2 Cust. Ct. 665 (Protests 171527-G of Kargere) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Protests 171527-G of Kargere, 2 Cust. Ct. 665 (cusc 1939).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel the merchandise in question was held dutiable as follows: (1) articles and fabrics in chief value of artificial silk the same as those passed upon in Abstract 37230 at 60 percent under paragraph 31; (2) embroidered articles at 75 percent under paragraph 1430, Glemby’s Sons v. United States (13 Ct. Cust. Appls. 533, T. D. 41397) followed; and (3) straw hats the same as those the subject of Stern v. United States (12 id. 514, T. D. 40701) at 50 percent under paragraph 1406.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel the merchandise in question was held dutiable as follows: (1) articles and fabrics in chief value of artificial silk the same as those passed upon in Abstract 37230 at 60 percent under paragraph 31; (2) embroidered articles at 75 percent under paragraph 1430, Glemby’s Sons v. United States (13 Ct. Cust. Appls. 533, T. D. 41397) followed; and (3) straw hats the same as those the subject of Stern v. United States (12 id. 514, T. D. 40701) at 50 percent under paragraph 1406.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 Cust. Ct. 665, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/protests-171527-g-of-kargere-cusc-1939.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack