Protests 165068-G of Matthew MacCarthy, Inc.

U.S. Customs Court

Protests 165068-G of Matthew MacCarthy, Inc.

3 Cust. Ct. 461

United States Customs Court·Decided October 26, 1939·No. No. 42573·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel Alengon laces similar to those the subject of United States v. Caesar (18 C. C. P. A. 106, T. D. 44067), filet lace articles like those passed on in United States v. Jabara (22 id. 77, T. D. 47065), and embroidered wearing apparel similar to that the subject of Pustet v. United States (13 Ct. Cust. Appls. 530, T. D. 41396) were held dutiable at 75 percent under paragraph 1430 as claimed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel Alengon laces similar to those the subject of United States v. Caesar (18 C. C. P. A. 106, T. D. 44067), filet lace articles like those passed on in United States v. Jabara (22 id. 77, T. D. 47065), and embroidered wearing apparel similar to that the subject of Pustet v. United States (13 Ct. Cust. Appls. 530, T. D. 41396) were held dutiable at 75 percent under paragraph 1430 as claimed.

Protests 165068-G of Matthew MacCarthy, Inc., 3 Cust. Ct. 461 (cusc 1939).

Pincite

3 Cust. Ct. 461 (Protests 165068-G of Matthew MacCarthy, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related