Protests 161718-G of F. M. Jabara & Bros.

U.S. Customs Court

Protests 161718-G of F. M. Jabara & Bros.

4 Cust. Ct. 383

United States Customs Court·Decided January 29, 1940·No. No. 43135·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

From the evidence it was found that certain items consist of filet lace similar to that involved in United States v. Jabara (22 C. C. P. A. 77, T. D. 47065), Venice lace like that passed upon in Littwitz v. United States (3 Cust. Ct. 123, C. D. 217), Alenpon lace similar to that involved in United States v. Caesar (18 C. C. P. A. 106, T. D. 44067), and lace articles embroidered like those passed upon in Pustet v. United States (13 Ct. Cust. Appls. 530, T. D. 41396). The claim at 75 percent under paragraph 1430 was therefore sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

From the evidence it was found that certain items consist of filet lace similar to that involved in United States v. Jabara (22 C. C. P. A. 77, T. D. 47065), Venice lace like that passed upon in Littwitz v. United States (3 Cust. Ct. 123, C. D. 217), Alenpon lace similar to that involved in United States v. Caesar (18 C. C. P. A. 106, T. D. 44067), and lace articles embroidered like those passed upon in Pustet v. United States (13 Ct. Cust. Appls. 530, T. D. 41396). The claim at 75 percent under paragraph 1430 was therefore sustained.

Protests 161718-G of F. M. Jabara & Bros., 4 Cust. Ct. 383 (cusc 1940).

Pincite

4 Cust. Ct. 383 (Protests 161718-G of F. M. Jabara & Bros.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related