Protests 13643-K of Bache

U.S. Customs Court

Protests 13643-K of Bache

8 Cust. Ct. 504

United States Customs Court·Decided April 27, 1942·No. No. 47120·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

The appraiser’s report described the merchandise as “flat bottom, ungilt, faceted top glass jewels” and stated that they are similar to those involved in Solomon v. United States (13 Ct. Cust. Appls. 353, T. D. 41256). The collector’s report which was received in evidence stated that the [505] merchandise would now be properly classified at 40 percent under paragraph 218 (e) and (T. D. 49458). An officer of the plaintiff-corporation identified a ■sample and stated that the articles were used “in connection with bicycle, automobile, and so-called instrument lamps, to diffuse light therefrom.” On the Tecord presented and following the cited case the protests were sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

The appraiser’s report described the merchandise as “flat bottom, ungilt, faceted top glass jewels” and stated that they are similar to those involved in Solomon v. United States (13 Ct. Cust. Appls. 353, T. D. 41256). The collector’s report which was received in evidence stated that the [505] merchandise would now be properly classified at 40 percent under paragraph 218 (e) and (T. D. 49458). An officer of the plaintiff-corporation identified a ■sample and stated that the articles were used “in connection with bicycle, automobile, and so-called instrument lamps, to diffuse light therefrom.” On the Tecord presented and following the cited case the protests were sustained.

Protests 13643-K of Bache, 8 Cust. Ct. 504 (cusc 1942).

Pincite

8 Cust. Ct. 504 (Protests 13643-K of Bache) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related