Protests 116509-K of B. Shackman & Co.
16 Cust. Ct. 278
Opinion
Opinion by
In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following Joseph Schmidt, Inc. v. United States (9 Cust. Ct. 188, C. D. 690), the merchandise-in question was held not subject to countervailing duty.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Protests 116509-K of B. Shackman & Co., 16 Cust. Ct. 278 (cusc 1946).
16 Cust. Ct. 278 (Protests 116509-K of B. Shackman & Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Joseph Schmidt, Inc. v. United States
9 Cust. Ct. 188 (U.S. Customs Court, 1942)