Protests 116509-K of B. Shackman & Co.
16 Cust. Ct. 278
This text of 16 Cust. Ct. 278 (Protests 116509-K of B. Shackman & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Protests 116509-K of B. Shackman & Co., 16 Cust. Ct. 278 (cusc 1946).
Opinion
Opinion by
In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following Joseph Schmidt, Inc. v. United States (9 Cust. Ct. 188, C. D. 690), the merchandise-in question was held not subject to countervailing duty.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Joseph Schmidt, Inc. v. United States
9 Cust. Ct. 188 (U.S. Customs Court, 1942)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
16 Cust. Ct. 278, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/protests-116509-k-of-b-shackman-co-cusc-1946.