Protests 10964-K of E. Leitz, Inc.
5 Cust. Ct. 436
Opinion
Opinion by
In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of Abstract 7038, United States v. Leitz (24 C. C. P. A. 139, T. D. 48622) and United Stales v. Zeiss (id. 145, T. D. 48624) the merchandise in question was held dutiable as photographic cameras and parts thereof at 20 percent under paragraph 1551 as claimed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Protests 10964-K of E. Leitz, Inc., 5 Cust. Ct. 436 (cusc 1940).
5 Cust. Ct. 436 (Protests 10964-K of E. Leitz, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.