Protests 10628-K of Absorbo Beer Pad Co.

U.S. Customs Court

Protests 10628-K of Absorbo Beer Pad Co.

10 Cust. Ct. 364

United States Customs Court·Decided January 1, 1943·No. No. 47867·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

It was stipulated between counsel that the involved merchandise is not plate finished, supercalendered or friction calendered, laminated by means of an adhesive substance, coated, surface-stained or dyed, lined or vat-lined. In accordance with said stipulation and the record in Absorbo Beer Pad Co. v. United States (30 C. C. P. A. 24, C. A. D., 209), which was incorporated in the case at bar, the pulpboard in question was found to be not embossed, decorated, or ornamented in any manner, and therefore held dutiable at 10 percent under paragraph 1402 as claimed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

It was stipulated between counsel that the involved merchandise is not plate finished, supercalendered or friction calendered, laminated by means of an adhesive substance, coated, surface-stained or dyed, lined or vat-lined. In accordance with said stipulation and the record in Absorbo Beer Pad Co. v. United States (30 C. C. P. A. 24, C. A. D., 209), which was incorporated in the case at bar, the pulpboard in question was found to be not embossed, decorated, or ornamented in any manner, and therefore held dutiable at 10 percent under paragraph 1402 as claimed.

Protests 10628-K of Absorbo Beer Pad Co., 10 Cust. Ct. 364 (cusc 1943).

Pincite

10 Cust. Ct. 364 (Protests 10628-K of Absorbo Beer Pad Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.