Protests 10254-G of Stern Bros.

4 Cust. Ct. 525
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedJune 12, 1940
DocketNo. 43941
StatusPublished

This text of 4 Cust. Ct. 525 (Protests 10254-G of Stern Bros.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Protests 10254-G of Stern Bros., 4 Cust. Ct. 525 (cusc 1940).

Opinion

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

From the record it was found that certain items consist of embroidered trimmings, filet lace articles similar to those involved in United States v. Jabara (22 C. C. P. A. 77, T. D 47065), Normandy laces similar to those in United States v. Amrein (26 id. 353, C. A. D. 40), covers, runners, cushions, wearing apparel, sachets, veils, and other articles, embroidered, like those involved in Abstract 11620, and Venice laces similar to those the subject of Littwitz v. United States (3 Cust. Ct. 123, C. D. 217). As to these items the claim at 75 percent under paragraph 1430 was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Max Littwitz, Inc. v. United States
3 Cust. Ct. 123 (U.S. Customs Court, 1939)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
4 Cust. Ct. 525, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/protests-10254-g-of-stern-bros-cusc-1940.