Protests 100071-K of R. Dixon & Co.

16 Cust. Ct. 206
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedJanuary 11, 1946
DocketNo. 50813
StatusPublished

This text of 16 Cust. Ct. 206 (Protests 100071-K of R. Dixon & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Protests 100071-K of R. Dixon & Co., 16 Cust. Ct. 206 (cusc 1946).

Opinion

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and the decisions cited, the following allowances were made to compensate for the weight of the inedible substance on the outside of the cheese: (1) 2)4 percent for cheese similar in all material respects either to the Romano, Pecorino Romano Sardo, Provolone, or Sbrinz cheese the subject of Scaramelli v. United States (9 Cust. Ct. 270, C. D. 706), or to the Gouda cheese involved in Abstract 48269; and (2) 1 percent for the cheese similar to the Reggiano cheese which was the subject of Scaramelli v. United States, supra. The protests were sustained to this extent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Scaramelli & Co. v. United States
9 Cust. Ct. 270 (U.S. Customs Court, 1942)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
16 Cust. Ct. 206, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/protests-100071-k-of-r-dixon-co-cusc-1946.