Protest of First Nat. Bank
This text of 1930 OK 228 (Protest of First Nat. Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is an appeal from the judgment of the Court of Tax Review dismissing the protest of the First National Bank of Enid, Okla., against the application of a legal rate of ad valorem tax levy fixed by the excise board of Garfield county, Okla., to the property of the protestant. The Court of Tax Review dismissed the protest on the ground that that court was without jurisdiction to determine the issue presented.
The protestant contends that the rate of levy fixed by the excise board of Garfield county for ad valorem tax purposes could not be lawfully applied to its property because the rate so fixed was excessive and in violation of section 5219, Rev. Stat. of the United States, as amended by the Act of March 4, 1923, and section 9607, C. O. S. 1921.
The issue presented was determined by this court in Protest of First Nat. Bank of Guthrie,
The judgment of the Court of Tax Review is affirmed.
LESTER, V. C. J., and CLARK, RILEY, HEFNER, CULLISON, and SWINDALL, JJ., concur. MASON, C. J., and HUNT, J., absent.
Note. See "Taxation," 37 Cyc. p. 1087, n. 46. *Page 116
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1930 OK 228, 287 P. 1043, 143 Okla. 115, 1930 Okla. LEXIS 571, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/protest-of-first-nat-bank-okla-1930.