Protest 998179-G of Fred. Haslam & Co.
This text of 17 Cust. Ct. 220 (Protest 998179-G of Fred. Haslam & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[221]*221Opinion by
At the trial the plaintiff moved in evidence, without objection, two memorandums signed by the assistant appraiser at New York, the truth of the contents of which was agreed to by counsel for the Government. It appeared therefrom that as to the merchandise classified at 40 percent under paragraph 923, it consists of bougies and catheters in chief value of gum, similar to that covered by Bard v. United States (T. D. 49189) and Bard v. United States (2 Cust. Ct. 244, C. D. 134), therein held dutiable at 20 percent under paragraph 1558; that as to the merchandise classified at 65 percent under paragraph 1211, the items on the invoice marked “X” are similar to those held dutiable at 45 percent under paragraph 397, as in chief value of metal, and that as to the remaining items assessed at 65 percent, they are all similar to those held to be in chief value of gum in said T. D. 49189 and C. D. 134, dutiable at 20 percent under paragraph 1558. The protest was sustained to the extent indicated but overruled n all other respects.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
17 Cust. Ct. 220, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/protest-998179-g-of-fred-haslam-co-cusc-1946.