Protest 997356-G of Hahne & Burns
This text of 5 Cust. Ct. 277 (Protest 997356-G of Hahne & Burns) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion by
The record showed that the dried ginger was imported from Freetown, Sierra Leone, in bags. It appeared from the papers that some of the bags were marked “Sierra Leone” while others were marked “Sa. Leone.” It was held that the collector erred in assessing the marking duty on the merchandise which was marked “Sierra Leone.” In view of Lorillard v. United States (24 C. C. P. A. 90, T. D. 48412) it was held that the marking “Sa. Leone” was sufficient. Abstracts 32638, 36598, 39884, 40802, and 43151 cited. Following Kraft v. United States (22 C. C. P. A. 111, T. D. 47103) the protest was sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
5 Cust. Ct. 277, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/protest-997356-g-of-hahne-burns-cusc-1940.