Protest 996389-G of Daniel F. Young, Inc.
This text of 4 Cust. Ct. 498 (Protest 996389-G of Daniel F. Young, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion by
The record showed that the seeds in question are the product of The Netherlands, that the immediate containers were small bags, and at the time of importation each bag had attached a paper label containing the words “Product of The Netherlands.” On the authority of Asiam v. United States (25 C. C. P. A. 68, T. D. 49065) it was held that the proper marking on paper labels is sufficient. On the authority of Kraft v. United States (22 id. 111, T. D. 47103) the protest was sustained. American Hatters & Furriers Co. v. United States (1 Cust. Ct. 111, C. D. 31) and Abstracts 40549, 41128, and 42581 cited.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
4 Cust. Ct. 498, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/protest-996389-g-of-daniel-f-young-inc-cusc-1940.