Protest 996389-G of Daniel F. Young, Inc.

U.S. Customs Court

Protest 996389-G of Daniel F. Young, Inc.

4 Cust. Ct. 498

United States Customs Court·Decided May 29, 1940·No. No. 43807·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Cline, J.

The record showed that the seeds in question are the product of The Netherlands, that the immediate containers were small bags, and at the time of importation each bag had attached a paper label containing the words “Product of The Netherlands.” On the authority of Asiam v. United States (25 C. C. P. A. 68, T. D. 49065) it was held that the proper marking on paper labels is sufficient. On the authority of Kraft v. United States (22 id. 111, T. D. 47103) the protest was sustained. American Hatters & Furriers Co. v. United States (1 Cust. Ct. 111, C. D. 31) and Abstracts 40549, 41128, and 42581 cited.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Cline, J.

The record showed that the seeds in question are the product of The Netherlands, that the immediate containers were small bags, and at the time of importation each bag had attached a paper label containing the words “Product of The Netherlands.” On the authority of Asiam v. United States (25 C. C. P. A. 68, T. D. 49065) it was held that the proper marking on paper labels is sufficient. On the authority of Kraft v. United States (22 id. 111, T. D. 47103) the protest was sustained. American Hatters & Furriers Co. v. United States (1 Cust. Ct. 111, C. D. 31) and Abstracts 40549, 41128, and 42581 cited.

Protest 996389-G of Daniel F. Young, Inc., 4 Cust. Ct. 498 (cusc 1940).

Pincite

4 Cust. Ct. 498 (Protest 996389-G of Daniel F. Young, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related