Protest 99570-K of Stebner
13 Cust. Ct. 317
Opinion
Opinion by
At the trial the plaintiff failed to appear either in person or by attorney. An examination of the protest papers failed to disclose anything to establish that the fur coat in question was purchased as an incident of the trip made by the plaintiff. In the absence of evidence that the trip was not made for the sole purpose of acquiring the fur coat, the protest was overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Protest 99570-K of Stebner, 13 Cust. Ct. 317 (cusc 1944).
13 Cust. Ct. 317 (Protest 99570-K of Stebner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.