Protest 994965-G of Loeser
This text of 7 Cust. Ct. 268 (Protest 994965-G of Loeser) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion by
It appeared from the evidence that the plaintiff and his wife were married approximately 4 months and 7 days before their household effects were packed for shipment to the United States and that the articles in question were used or readily available for use in their household during that period only, although acquired several years prior to that time. At the second trial the plaintiff submitted the protest without the introduction of further evidence. In view of paragraph 1632, which exempts household effects providing that the same have been used abroad not less than 1 year, and further reviewing the evidence before it, the court was constrained to adhere to its previous decision. The protest was therefore overruled. See Haas v. United States (1 Cust. Ct. 140, C. D. 37) and decision on rehearing in that case (Abstract 41740) as well as an erratum in connection with the latter decision published in Treasury Decisions, vol. 77, No. 1, page 19. Abstract 41741 also cited.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
7 Cust. Ct. 268, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/protest-994965-g-of-loeser-cusc-1941.