Protest 993398-G of Ballmill Lumber Co.
8 Cust. Ct. 440
Opinion
Opinion by
It was stipulated that the lumber in question is similar in all material respects to that the subject of Seaboard Lumber Sales Co. v. United States (5 Cust. Ct. 161, C. D. 391). In accordance therewith it was held that no addition should have been made to the imported quantity for planing, tonguing, and grooving. The protest was therefore sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Protest 993398-G of Ballmill Lumber Co., 8 Cust. Ct. 440 (cusc 1942).
8 Cust. Ct. 440 (Protest 993398-G of Ballmill Lumber Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Seaboard Lumber Sales Co. v. United States
5 Cust. Ct. 161 (U.S. Customs Court, 1940)