Protest 988248-G of H. S. Dorf & Co.

U.S. Customs Court

Protest 988248-G of H. S. Dorf & Co.

4 Cust. Ct. 416

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedMarch 8, 1940

DocketNo. 43345

StatusPublished

This text of 4 Cust. Ct. 416 (Protest 988248-G of H. S. Dorf & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Protest 988248-G of H. S. Dorf & Co., 4 Cust. Ct. 416 (cusc 1940).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Cline, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of kidskins which were contained in bales marked “E-r-y-t-r-h-e-a.” It was found that even by an examination of the standard authorities a purchaser of merchandise having the name “E-r-y-t-r-h-e-a” printed thereon could not tell definitely where it was produced. On the authority of American Burtonizing Co. v. United States (13 Ct. Cust. Appls. 652, T. D. 41489) the protest was overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Cline, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of kidskins which were contained in bales marked “E-r-y-t-r-h-e-a.” It was found that even by an examination of the standard authorities a purchaser of merchandise having the name “E-r-y-t-r-h-e-a” printed thereon could not tell definitely where it was produced. On the authority of American Burtonizing Co. v. United States (13 Ct. Cust. Appls. 652, T. D. 41489) the protest was overruled.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

4 Cust. Ct. 416, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/protest-988248-g-of-h-s-dorf-co-cusc-1940.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack