Protest 987665-G of Liepmannssohn

3 Cust. Ct. 506

Opinion

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

From the evidence it was found that the watch was actually ówned by the plaintiff and in his possession abroad at the time of or prior to his departure from a foreign country. It appeared that it was presented to him by his father who had acquired it from his grandfather to whom it -was presented for meritorious service. The claim for free entry under paragraph TJ98 was sustained.