Protest 98751-K of Wah Shang Co.

17 Cust. Ct. 173
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedAugust 26, 1946
DocketNo. 51274
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 17 Cust. Ct. 173 (Protest 98751-K of Wah Shang Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Protest 98751-K of Wah Shang Co., 17 Cust. Ct. 173 (cusc 1946).

Opinion

[174]*174Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

From the testimony it appeared that the collector’s original liquidation was taken pursuant to the decision reported in Columbia Co. v. United States (5 Cust. Ct. 175, C. D. 395): The reliquidation was taken pursuant to instructions from the Commissioner of Customs received October 29, 1941. Inasmuch as section 514, Tariff Act of 1930, provides that liquidation in the absence of protest “upon the expiration of sixty days from the date” thereof shall be final and conclusive upon all persons, it was held that under said section the collector had no power to reliquidate after the expiration of the 60-day period. (John S. Phipps v. United States, 22 C. C. P. A. 595, T. D. 47601; McKesson Wholesale Drug Co. v. United States, 65 Treas. Dec. 478, T. D. 46955; and Pacific Brokerage Co. v. United States, 3 Cust. Ct. 20, C. D. 193, cited.) The plaintiff’s claim was therefore sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lee Mon Wine & Liquor Co. v. United States
34 Cust. Ct. 191 (U.S. Customs Court, 1955)
Westco Liquor, Products Co. v. United States
24 Cust. Ct. 120 (U.S. Customs Court, 1950)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
17 Cust. Ct. 173, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/protest-98751-k-of-wah-shang-co-cusc-1946.