Protest 987157-G of Nozaki Bros.

U.S. Customs Court

Protest 987157-G of Nozaki Bros.

5 Cust. Ct. 437

United States Customs Court·Decided December 17, 1940·No. No. 44979·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Walker, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of Nozaki v. United States (1 Cust. Ct. 262, C. D. 61) the claim for free, entry was sustained. A motion to dismiss the protest on the ground that no new issue was involved in the reliquidation so far as the boxes were concerned was denied. United States v. Dickson (139 Fed. 251, T. D. 26422), Herrmann v. United States (G. A. 5346, T. D. 24459), Dow v. United States (T. D. 48163), United Slates v. Kurtz (5 Ct. Cust. Appls. 144, T. D. 34192), and Smith v. United States (1 id. 489, T. D. 31527) cited.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Walker, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of Nozaki v. United States (1 Cust. Ct. 262, C. D. 61) the claim for free, entry was sustained. A motion to dismiss the protest on the ground that no new issue was involved in the reliquidation so far as the boxes were concerned was denied. United States v. Dickson (139 Fed. 251, T. D. 26422), Herrmann v. United States (G. A. 5346, T. D. 24459), Dow v. United States (T. D. 48163), United Slates v. Kurtz (5 Ct. Cust. Appls. 144, T. D. 34192), and Smith v. United States (1 id. 489, T. D. 31527) cited.

Protest 987157-G of Nozaki Bros., 5 Cust. Ct. 437 (cusc 1940).

Pincite

5 Cust. Ct. 437 (Protest 987157-G of Nozaki Bros.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related