Protest 985872-G of Sidney Adler & Co.

U.S. Customs Court

Protest 985872-G of Sidney Adler & Co.

5 Cust. Ct. 261

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedJune 21, 1940

DocketNo. 44002

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 5 Cust. Ct. 261 (Protest 985872-G of Sidney Adler & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Protest 985872-G of Sidney Adler & Co., 5 Cust. Ct. 261 (cusc 1940).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

It was found that the flower pots m question are composed of only one piece of earthenware rather than two pieces and that claim was therefore sustained. A sample of the earthenware articles showed that it is in the form of a small baby carriage of white chinaware embossed in the mold. The claim at 10 cents per dozen pieces and 45 percent ad valorem as plain white earthenware under paragraph 211 was therefore sustained. United States v. Todd (11 Ct. Cust. Appls. 50, T. D. 38690) and T. D. 44592 cited.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

It was found that the flower pots m question are composed of only one piece of earthenware rather than two pieces and that claim was therefore sustained. A sample of the earthenware articles showed that it is in the form of a small baby carriage of white chinaware embossed in the mold. The claim at 10 cents per dozen pieces and 45 percent ad valorem as plain white earthenware under paragraph 211 was therefore sustained. United States v. Todd (11 Ct. Cust. Appls. 50, T. D. 38690) and T. D. 44592 cited.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

5 Cust. Ct. 261, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/protest-985872-g-of-sidney-adler-co-cusc-1940.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack