Protest 985449-G of Rosenfelder
This text of 6 Cust. Ct. 498 (Protest 985449-G of Rosenfelder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion by
The record showed that the skins are not required to be marked but that the bales were marked “Pr. of Can.” and they were required to be marked “Product of Canada” before being released from customs custody. From the record and following Givaudan v. United States (22 C. C. P. A. 115, T. D. 47104), Denton Felt & Hair Co. (27 id. 282, C. A. D. 101), Connor v. United States (28 id. -, C. A. D. 143), and Abstract 35794 the court held that the marking “Pr. of Can.” was insufficient to indicate that Canada is the country of origin. The protest was therefore overruled. Lorillard v. United States (24 C. C. P. A. 90, T. D. 48412) and Abstracts 37656, 32638, and 38243 cited.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
6 Cust. Ct. 498, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/protest-985449-g-of-rosenfelder-cusc-1941.