Protest 985426-G of Hill
6 Cust. Ct. 651
Opinion
Opinion by
There was testimony that the articles in question were purchased in the United States prior to the plaintiff’s departure for Palestine in 1932 and that they remained in her possession in her household up to the time she emigrated to the United States. They were therefore held free of duty as household effects under paragraph 1632 as claimed. Haas v. United States (1 Cust. Ct. 140, C. D. 37) followed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Protest 985426-G of Hill, 6 Cust. Ct. 651 (cusc 1941).
6 Cust. Ct. 651 (Protest 985426-G of Hill) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Haas v. United States
1 Cust. Ct. 140 (U.S. Customs Court, 1938)