Protest 985341-G of W. X. Huber Co.

U.S. Customs Court

Protest 985341-G of W. X. Huber Co.

11 Cust. Ct. 315

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedDecember 1, 1943

DocketNo. 49005

StatusPublished

This text of 11 Cust. Ct. 315 (Protest 985341-G of W. X. Huber Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Protest 985341-G of W. X. Huber Co., 11 Cust. Ct. 315 (cusc 1943).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

At the trial a sample of the merchandise was admitted as exhibit 1, and counsel for plaintiff conceded that the so-called hem or edge was done by hand, and stated, “There is no question of machine work involved here at all.” Such evidence as was presented was found not sufficient to establish that the handkerchiefs are not, in fact, made with hand-rolled or hand-made hems. The protest was therefore overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

At the trial a sample of the merchandise was admitted as exhibit 1, and counsel for plaintiff conceded that the so-called hem or edge was done by hand, and stated, “There is no question of machine work involved here at all.” Such evidence as was presented was found not sufficient to establish that the handkerchiefs are not, in fact, made with hand-rolled or hand-made hems. The protest was therefore overruled.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

11 Cust. Ct. 315, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/protest-985341-g-of-w-x-huber-co-cusc-1943.