Protest 976832-G of H. Rosenhirsch Co.

U.S. Customs Court

Protest 976832-G of H. Rosenhirsch Co.

11 Cust. Ct. 216

United States Customs Court·Decided July 14, 1943·No. No. 48550·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Cline, J.

The record showed that the merchandise was imported from London but that the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics is the country of origin; that the bristles are not capable of being marked but that the cases were marked “Made in Russia” when imported, and the collector required that they be marked “U. S. S. R. Russia” before it was released. The defendant cited Abstract 42579. Following Williams v. United States (26 C. C. P. A. 210, C. A. D. 19), wherein the merchandise was marked “Packed in Russia,” the merchandise in question was held legally marked when imported. The protest was therefore sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Cline, J.

The record showed that the merchandise was imported from London but that the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics is the country of origin; that the bristles are not capable of being marked but that the cases were marked “Made in Russia” when imported, and the collector required that they be marked “U. S. S. R. Russia” before it was released. The defendant cited Abstract 42579. Following Williams v. United States (26 C. C. P. A. 210, C. A. D. 19), wherein the merchandise was marked “Packed in Russia,” the merchandise in question was held legally marked when imported. The protest was therefore sustained.

Protest 976832-G of H. Rosenhirsch Co., 11 Cust. Ct. 216 (cusc 1943).

Pincite

11 Cust. Ct. 216 (Protest 976832-G of H. Rosenhirsch Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.