Protest 976832-G of H. Rosenhirsch Co.
This text of 11 Cust. Ct. 216 (Protest 976832-G of H. Rosenhirsch Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion by
The record showed that the merchandise was imported from London but that the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics is the country of origin; that the bristles are not capable of being marked but that the cases were marked “Made in Russia” when imported, and the collector required that they be marked “U. S. S. R. Russia” before it was released. The defendant cited Abstract 42579. Following Williams v. United States (26 C. C. P. A. 210, C. A. D. 19), wherein the merchandise was marked “Packed in Russia,” the merchandise in question was held legally marked when imported. The protest was therefore sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
11 Cust. Ct. 216, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/protest-976832-g-of-h-rosenhirsch-co-cusc-1943.