Protest 967825-G of W. X. Huber Co.

U.S. Customs Court

Protest 967825-G of W. X. Huber Co.

12 Cust. Ct. 300

United States Customs Court·Decided April 21, 1944·No. No. 49375·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

At the trial the importer testified that the fish in question was not packed in oil and that the packing material was lard. A sample [301]*301of the merchandise was admitted in evidence as exhibit 1 and upon agreement of counsel it was sent to the customs laboratory in New York for analysis. The laboratory report, admitted as exhibit 2, stated that “the fish are fried or packed in lard.” In accordance therewith the claim at 25 percent under paragraph 718 was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

At the trial the importer testified that the fish in question was not packed in oil and that the packing material was lard. A sample [301]*301of the merchandise was admitted in evidence as exhibit 1 and upon agreement of counsel it was sent to the customs laboratory in New York for analysis. The laboratory report, admitted as exhibit 2, stated that “the fish are fried or packed in lard.” In accordance therewith the claim at 25 percent under paragraph 718 was sustained.

Protest 967825-G of W. X. Huber Co., 12 Cust. Ct. 300 (cusc 1944).

Pincite

12 Cust. Ct. 300 (Protest 967825-G of W. X. Huber Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.