Protest 96629-K of M. Lehmann, Inc.

U.S. Customs Court

Protest 96629-K of M. Lehmann, Inc.

18 Cust. Ct. 214

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedJune 11, 1947

DocketNo. 51780

StatusPublished

This text of 18 Cust. Ct. 214 (Protest 96629-K of M. Lehmann, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Protest 96629-K of M. Lehmann, Inc., 18 Cust. Ct. 214 (cusc 1947).

Pincite

Opinion

[215]*215Opinion, by

Ekwall, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of Scotch whisky aged in wooden containers at least 4 years prior to the date of entry or withdrawal from warehouse for consumption; that at the time of withdrawal for consumption the age certificate required by article 459, Customs Regulations of 1937, was not available;;and that there now has been filed with the collector a certificate issued by a competent officer of the Government of Great Britain establishing to the satisfaction of the collector that the Scotch whisky in question was in fact aged in wooden containers not less than 4 years prior to exportation to the United States. The claim of the plaintiff was therefore sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[215]*215Opinion, by

Ekwall, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of Scotch whisky aged in wooden containers at least 4 years prior to the date of entry or withdrawal from warehouse for consumption; that at the time of withdrawal for consumption the age certificate required by article 459, Customs Regulations of 1937, was not available;;and that there now has been filed with the collector a certificate issued by a competent officer of the Government of Great Britain establishing to the satisfaction of the collector that the Scotch whisky in question was in fact aged in wooden containers not less than 4 years prior to exportation to the United States. The claim of the plaintiff was therefore sustained.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

18 Cust. Ct. 214, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/protest-96629-k-of-m-lehmann-inc-cusc-1947.