Protest 96555-K of Snellenberg

U.S. Customs Court

Protest 96555-K of Snellenberg

14 Cust. Ct. 193

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedJanuary 20, 1945

DocketNo. 49968

StatusPublished

This text of 14 Cust. Ct. 193 (Protest 96555-K of Snellenberg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Protest 96555-K of Snellenberg, 14 Cust. Ct. 193 (cusc 1945).

Pincite

Opinion

[194]*194, Opinion by

Tilson, J.

During the trial a sample of the merchandise was admitted in evidence. The examiner at the port of entry testified that the merchandise was similar in all material respects to that the subject of United States v. Hochschild, Kohn (31 C. C. P. A. 98, C. A. D. 255). Upon the established facts and following the cited authority the merchandise was held dutiable as claimed. The protest was sustained to this extent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[194]*194, Opinion by

Tilson, J.

During the trial a sample of the merchandise was admitted in evidence. The examiner at the port of entry testified that the merchandise was similar in all material respects to that the subject of United States v. Hochschild, Kohn (31 C. C. P. A. 98, C. A. D. 255). Upon the established facts and following the cited authority the merchandise was held dutiable as claimed. The protest was sustained to this extent.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

14 Cust. Ct. 193, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/protest-96555-k-of-snellenberg-cusc-1945.