Protest 96555-K of Snellenberg

U.S. Customs Court

Protest 96555-K of Snellenberg

14 Cust. Ct. 193

United States Customs Court·Decided January 20, 1945·No. No. 49968·Published

Opinion

[194]*194, Opinion by

Tilson, J.

During the trial a sample of the merchandise was admitted in evidence. The examiner at the port of entry testified that the merchandise was similar in all material respects to that the subject of United States v. Hochschild, Kohn (31 C. C. P. A. 98, C. A. D. 255). Upon the established facts and following the cited authority the merchandise was held dutiable as claimed. The protest was sustained to this extent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[194]*194, Opinion by

Tilson, J.

During the trial a sample of the merchandise was admitted in evidence. The examiner at the port of entry testified that the merchandise was similar in all material respects to that the subject of United States v. Hochschild, Kohn (31 C. C. P. A. 98, C. A. D. 255). Upon the established facts and following the cited authority the merchandise was held dutiable as claimed. The protest was sustained to this extent.

Protest 96555-K of Snellenberg, 14 Cust. Ct. 193 (cusc 1945).

Pincite

14 Cust. Ct. 193 (Protest 96555-K of Snellenberg) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.