Protest 965310-G of Vandegrift
3 Cust. Ct. 435
Opinion
Opinion by
There was no proof to show whether or not the imported product is or is not manufactured. A witness stated that the product is “a waste hair product from textile mills. It is mostly cattle hair.” The claim for free entry under paragraph 1688 was therefore overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Protest 965310-G of Vandegrift, 3 Cust. Ct. 435 (cusc 1939).
3 Cust. Ct. 435 (Protest 965310-G of Vandegrift) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.