Protest 964255-G of Nippon Import & Trading Co.
Opinion
Opinion by
It was conceded that the merchandise consists of floor coverings 21 inches wide and 9 feet long, composed in chief value of cotton. The sole question for determination is whether the imported articles are “rugs.” It was found that the evidence offered is not sufficient for a proper determination of the common meaning of the terms “rug” and “runner.” United States v. Stetson (21 C. C. P. A. 3, T. D. 46319), United States v. Gavin (23 id. 288, T. D. 48164), and United States v. Bailey (24 id. 196, T. D. 48655) cited. On the record the protest was overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
2 Cust. Ct. 745 (Protest 964255-G of Nippon Import & Trading Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.