Protest 962775-G of Rosenbluth Bros.
3 Cust. Ct. 434
Opinion
[435] Opinion by
It appeared that the cases and the immediate containers were marked but that the goods themselves were- not marked in a conspicuous place, as the marking was placed on the top article only and it was folded under. On the authority of Kraft v. United States (22 C. C. P. A. 111, T. D. 47103) the protest was sustained as to one case.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Protest 962775-G of Rosenbluth Bros., 3 Cust. Ct. 434 (cusc 1939).
3 Cust. Ct. 434 (Protest 962775-G of Rosenbluth Bros.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.