Protest 961369-G of Atlas Marine Supply Co.

U.S. Customs Court

Protest 961369-G of Atlas Marine Supply Co.

6 Cust. Ct. 565

United States Customs Court·Decided February 27, 1941·No. No. 45480·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Cline, J.

The record showed that the lubricating oil in question was exported from bonded warehouse under customs supervision without having been withdrawn previously from the custody or control of the Government. Although the containers were not legally marked when imported it was held that the merchandise is excepted from the provision assessing duty under section 304 (b). The protest was therefore sustained. Atlas v. United States (2 Cust. Ct. 491, C. D. 185) followed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Cline, J.

The record showed that the lubricating oil in question was exported from bonded warehouse under customs supervision without having been withdrawn previously from the custody or control of the Government. Although the containers were not legally marked when imported it was held that the merchandise is excepted from the provision assessing duty under section 304 (b). The protest was therefore sustained. Atlas v. United States (2 Cust. Ct. 491, C. D. 185) followed.

Protest 961369-G of Atlas Marine Supply Co., 6 Cust. Ct. 565 (cusc 1941).

Pincite

6 Cust. Ct. 565 (Protest 961369-G of Atlas Marine Supply Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related