Protest 961065-G of Rice, Bayersdorfer Co.

3 Cust. Ct. 438
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedOctober 13, 1939
DocketNo. 42424
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 3 Cust. Ct. 438 (Protest 961065-G of Rice, Bayersdorfer Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Protest 961065-G of Rice, Bayersdorfer Co., 3 Cust. Ct. 438 (cusc 1939).

Opinion

Opinion by

McClelland, P. J.

It was conceded by both sides that the merchandise consists of artificial flowers composed in chief value of glass. The sample consisted of a group of three wires, each approximately a foot long, joined together at one end, and for a space of about 2 inches from the joining, wrapped in tinfoil. From that point almost to the end of each of the wires they are covered by a long glass tube which, at regular intervals, has been blown or bulged in such a manner that it appears to be a series of individual beads. There is, however, no separation between each of the bulges, the- entire glass part of the article being in one piece. These bulges were held not to be beads. The claim at 60 percent under paragraph 1518 was therefore sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rice-Bayersdorfer Co. v. United States
71 Cust. Ct. 9 (U.S. Customs Court, 1973)
Joseph Markovits, Inc. v. United States
45 Cust. Ct. 151 (U.S. Customs Court, 1960)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
3 Cust. Ct. 438, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/protest-961065-g-of-rice-bayersdorfer-co-cusc-1939.