Protest 961065-G of Rice, Bayersdorfer Co.

3 Cust. Ct. 438
United States Customs Court·Decided October 13, 1939·No. No. 42424·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Opinion by

McClelland, P. J.

It was conceded by both sides that the merchandise consists of artificial flowers composed in chief value of glass. The sample consisted of a group of three wires, each approximately a foot long, joined together at one end, and for a space of about 2 inches from the joining, wrapped in tinfoil. From that point almost to the end of each of the wires they are covered by a long glass tube which, at regular intervals, has been blown or bulged in such a manner that it appears to be a series of individual beads. There is, however, no separation between each of the bulges, the- entire glass part of the article being in one piece. These bulges were held not to be beads. The claim at 60 percent under paragraph 1518 was therefore sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Protest 961065-G of Rice, Bayersdorfer Co., 3 Cust. Ct. 438 (cusc 1939).

3 Cust. Ct. 438 (Protest 961065-G of Rice, Bayersdorfer Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rice-Bayersdorfer Co. v. United States
71 Cust. Ct. 9 (U.S. Customs Court, 1973)
Joseph Markovits, Inc. v. United States
45 Cust. Ct. 151 (U.S. Customs Court, 1960)