Protest 958856-G of Abercrombie & Fitch Co.
5 Cust. Ct. 380
Opinion
Opinion by
The evidence showed that these lighters consist of two parts, a base and an upright piece, advertised as a combination table and pocket lighter. It was held that the fact that a purchaser might remove the lighter portion from the base and carry it in his pocket would not affect the classification status of the article. The claim at 60 percent under paragraph 1552 was sustained. Hecht Pearl Co. v. United States (18 C. C. P. A. 171, T. D. 44375) followed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Protest 958856-G of Abercrombie & Fitch Co., 5 Cust. Ct. 380 (cusc 1940).
5 Cust. Ct. 380 (Protest 958856-G of Abercrombie & Fitch Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Henry Wedemeyer, Inc. v. United States
63 Cust. Ct. 417 (U.S. Customs Court, 1969)
E. Miltenberg, Inc. v. United States
35 Cust. Ct. 235 (U.S. Customs Court, 1955)