Protest 958245-G of W. X. Huber Co.
This text of 11 Cust. Ct. 254 (Protest 958245-G of W. X. Huber Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion by
At the trial, on motion by the plaintiff, the record in a former case was admitted in evidence and another witness was called by the plaintiff, whose testimony was substantially the same as that of the previous witness except as to the period of time covered. This case is similar to Huber v. United States (6 Cust. Ct. 140, C. D. 448), in which there was an absence of proof that the material of which the merchandise was composed in chief value was not generally known as material for knitting, weaving, or sewing. It was found that in the case at bar this proof was also lacking. Following the cited decision the protest was overruled in all respects.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
11 Cust. Ct. 254, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/protest-958245-g-of-w-x-huber-co-cusc-1943.