Protest 957918-G of W. X. Huber Co.
6 Cust. Ct. 528
Opinion
Opinion by
It was found that the merchandise is a refuse thrown off or dropped from the machine in a manufacturing process. On the authority of Willits v. United States (11 C. C. P. A. 499, T. D. 39657), Harley v. United States (14 id. 112, T. D. 41644), Masson v. United States (15 id. 78, T. D. 42157), Eastman Kodak Co. v. United States (26 id. 315, C. A. D. 34), and Abstract 41389 the claim as waste at 10 percent under paragraph 1555 was sustained. Abstract 15381 (T. D. 28160) distinguished.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Protest 957918-G of W. X. Huber Co., 6 Cust. Ct. 528 (cusc 1941).
6 Cust. Ct. 528 (Protest 957918-G of W. X. Huber Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.