Protest 957185-G of N. Y. Merchandise Co.

U.S. Customs Court

Protest 957185-G of N. Y. Merchandise Co.

10 Cust. Ct. 368

United States Customs Court·Decided January 6, 1943·No. No. 47887·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel the merchandise in question was held dutiable as follows: (1) Marcel irons at 40 percent under paragraph 339 as household utensils, following Abstract 38680; (2) brass base shells at 35 percent under paragraph 353 as articles having as an essential feature an electrical element or device, such as signs, following New York Merchandise Co. v. United States (8 Cust. Ct. 209, C. D. 607); and (3) dime banks as hollow ware at 40 percent under paragraph 339, following Abstract 42749.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel the merchandise in question was held dutiable as follows: (1) Marcel irons at 40 percent under paragraph 339 as household utensils, following Abstract 38680; (2) brass base shells at 35 percent under paragraph 353 as articles having as an essential feature an electrical element or device, such as signs, following New York Merchandise Co. v. United States (8 Cust. Ct. 209, C. D. 607); and (3) dime banks as hollow ware at 40 percent under paragraph 339, following Abstract 42749.

Protest 957185-G of N. Y. Merchandise Co., 10 Cust. Ct. 368 (cusc 1943).

Pincite

10 Cust. Ct. 368 (Protest 957185-G of N. Y. Merchandise Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related