Protest 955382-G of Ferdinand Bing & Co.'s Successors

U.S. Customs Court

Protest 955382-G of Ferdinand Bing & Co.'s Successors

1 Cust. Ct. 470

United States Customs Court·Decided November 4, 1938·No. No. 39773·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Dallinger, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel atomizers, boxes, inkstands, menu holders, gueridons vases, and photo frames chiefly used on the table, in the household, or hollow ware were held dutiable at 40’ percent under paragraph 339 as claimed. United States v. Friedlaender (21 C. C. P. A. 103, T. D. 46445), Dow v. United States (id. 282, T. D. 46816), Woolworth v. United States (T. D. 47857), and Rice v. United States (T. D. 49373) cited.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Dallinger, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel atomizers, boxes, inkstands, menu holders, gueridons vases, and photo frames chiefly used on the table, in the household, or hollow ware were held dutiable at 40’ percent under paragraph 339 as claimed. United States v. Friedlaender (21 C. C. P. A. 103, T. D. 46445), Dow v. United States (id. 282, T. D. 46816), Woolworth v. United States (T. D. 47857), and Rice v. United States (T. D. 49373) cited.

Protest 955382-G of Ferdinand Bing & Co.'s Successors, 1 Cust. Ct. 470 (cusc 1938).

Pincite

1 Cust. Ct. 470 (Protest 955382-G of Ferdinand Bing & Co.'s Successors) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.