Protest 955268-G of W. X. Huber Co.
6 Cust. Ct. 574
Opinion
Opinion by
It appeared that the jars in question were packed in. cartons which were marked. As the anchovies were not capable of being marked and the .immediate containers, the bottles, were not marked it was held that additional duty was properly assessed. Givaudan v. United States (22 C. C. P. A. 115, T. D. 47104) and United States v. Martorelli (12 Ct. Cust. Appls., 327, T. D. 40483) followed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Protest 955268-G of W. X. Huber Co., 6 Cust. Ct. 574 (cusc 1941).
6 Cust. Ct. 574 (Protest 955268-G of W. X. Huber Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
United States v. Martorelli
12 Ct. Cust. 327 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1924)