Protest 95448-K of Italian Furniture Frames Corp.

U.S. Customs Court

Protest 95448-K of Italian Furniture Frames Corp.

11 Cust. Ct. 207

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedJuly 3, 1943

DocketNo. 48511

StatusPublished

This text of 11 Cust. Ct. 207 (Protest 95448-K of Italian Furniture Frames Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Protest 95448-K of Italian Furniture Frames Corp., 11 Cust. Ct. 207 (cusc 1943).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

At the trial the examiner testified that in case 398 two-sofa fronts in excess were found and there was nothing to indicate that they were-contained in other cases on the invoice. The plaintiff testified there were two sofa fronts missing in case 399, but as the invoice contained all of the merchandise shipped he did not think it necessary to file a claim for shortage. In view of Borgfeldt v. United States (11 Ct. Cust. Appls. 421, T. D. 39433), since the burden of proving that there had been a nonimportation was not met by competent evidence on behalf of the importer the protest was overruled, the court stating that the importers may not submit their protests to this court without any supporting-testimony to establish that the missing articles were not in fact landed in this country.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

At the trial the examiner testified that in case 398 two-sofa fronts in excess were found and there was nothing to indicate that they were-contained in other cases on the invoice. The plaintiff testified there were two sofa fronts missing in case 399, but as the invoice contained all of the merchandise shipped he did not think it necessary to file a claim for shortage. In view of Borgfeldt v. United States (11 Ct. Cust. Appls. 421, T. D. 39433), since the burden of proving that there had been a nonimportation was not met by competent evidence on behalf of the importer the protest was overruled, the court stating that the importers may not submit their protests to this court without any supporting-testimony to establish that the missing articles were not in fact landed in this country.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

11 Cust. Ct. 207, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/protest-95448-k-of-italian-furniture-frames-corp-cusc-1943.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack