Protest 953488-G of Greenberg
2 Cust. Ct. 792
Opinion
Opinion by
The merchandise was invoiced as a metal table lighter and returned by the examiner as a pocket lighter. An inspection of the same indicated that due to the base the article is not designed to carry about the person. The claim as smokers’ articles at 60 percent under paragraph -1552 was therefore sustained. California Bag & Metal Co. v. United States (C. D. 98) cited.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Protest 953488-G of Greenberg, 2 Cust. Ct. 792 (cusc 1939).
2 Cust. Ct. 792 (Protest 953488-G of Greenberg) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Henry Wedemeyer, Inc. v. United States
63 Cust. Ct. 417 (U.S. Customs Court, 1969)
E. Miltenberg, Inc. v. United States
35 Cust. Ct. 235 (U.S. Customs Court, 1955)