Protest 949110-G of Raylite Trading Co.

U.S. Customs Court

Protest 949110-G of Raylite Trading Co.

9 Cust. Ct. 440

United States Customs Court·Decided October 29, 1942·No. No. 47689·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Dallinger, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that tlie merchandise in question is the same as that the subject of New York Merchandise Co., Inc. v. United States (8 Cust. Ct. 209, C. D. 607), the brass shells in question were held dutiable, as claimed, at 35 percent under paragraph 353 as parts of articles having as an essential feature an electrical element or device, such as signs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Dallinger, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that tlie merchandise in question is the same as that the subject of New York Merchandise Co., Inc. v. United States (8 Cust. Ct. 209, C. D. 607), the brass shells in question were held dutiable, as claimed, at 35 percent under paragraph 353 as parts of articles having as an essential feature an electrical element or device, such as signs.

Protest 949110-G of Raylite Trading Co., 9 Cust. Ct. 440 (cusc 1942).

Pincite

9 Cust. Ct. 440 (Protest 949110-G of Raylite Trading Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related