Protest 949110-G of Raylite Trading Co.

U.S. Customs Court

Protest 949110-G of Raylite Trading Co.

9 Cust. Ct. 440

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedOctober 29, 1942

DocketNo. 47689

StatusPublished

This text of 9 Cust. Ct. 440 (Protest 949110-G of Raylite Trading Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Protest 949110-G of Raylite Trading Co., 9 Cust. Ct. 440 (cusc 1942).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Dallinger, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that tlie merchandise in question is the same as that the subject of New York Merchandise Co., Inc. v. United States (8 Cust. Ct. 209, C. D. 607), the brass shells in question were held dutiable, as claimed, at 35 percent under paragraph 353 as parts of articles having as an essential feature an electrical element or device, such as signs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Dallinger, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that tlie merchandise in question is the same as that the subject of New York Merchandise Co., Inc. v. United States (8 Cust. Ct. 209, C. D. 607), the brass shells in question were held dutiable, as claimed, at 35 percent under paragraph 353 as parts of articles having as an essential feature an electrical element or device, such as signs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

9 Cust. Ct. 440, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/protest-949110-g-of-raylite-trading-co-cusc-1942.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack