Protest 946777-G of New York Mdse. Co.

U.S. Customs Court

Protest 946777-G of New York Mdse. Co.

10 Cust. Ct. 367

United States Customs Court·Decided January 6, 1943·No. No. 47886·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of New York Merchandise Co. v. United States (8 Cust. Ct. 209, C. D. 607) the brass base shells in question were held dutiable at 35 percent ad valorem under paragraph 353, as parts of articles having as an essential feature an electrical element or device, such as signs, as claimed. It was also stipulated that the [368]*368marcel irons in question are chiefly used in the household for utilitarian purposes. The claim at 40 percent under paragraph 339 was therefore sustained, following Abstract 38680.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of New York Merchandise Co. v. United States (8 Cust. Ct. 209, C. D. 607) the brass base shells in question were held dutiable at 35 percent ad valorem under paragraph 353, as parts of articles having as an essential feature an electrical element or device, such as signs, as claimed. It was also stipulated that the [368]*368marcel irons in question are chiefly used in the household for utilitarian purposes. The claim at 40 percent under paragraph 339 was therefore sustained, following Abstract 38680.

Protest 946777-G of New York Mdse. Co., 10 Cust. Ct. 367 (cusc 1943).

Pincite

10 Cust. Ct. 367 (Protest 946777-G of New York Mdse. Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related