Protest 944414-G of New York Mdse. Co.

U.S. Customs Court

Protest 944414-G of New York Mdse. Co.

9 Cust. Ct. 458

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedDecember 7, 1942

DocketNo. 47781

StatusPublished

This text of 9 Cust. Ct. 458 (Protest 944414-G of New York Mdse. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Protest 944414-G of New York Mdse. Co., 9 Cust. Ct. 458 (cusc 1942).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of Abstract 38680 the metal banks in question, chiefly used in the household for utilitarian purposes, were held dutiable at 40 percent under paragraph 339 as claimed. It was also stipulated that the brass base shells in question are similar to those involved in New York Merchandise Co. v. United States (8 Cust. Ct. 209, C. D. 607). The claim that they are dutiable at 35 percent ad valorem under paragraph 353 as parts of articles having as an essential feature an electrical element or device, such as signs, was therefore sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of Abstract 38680 the metal banks in question, chiefly used in the household for utilitarian purposes, were held dutiable at 40 percent under paragraph 339 as claimed. It was also stipulated that the brass base shells in question are similar to those involved in New York Merchandise Co. v. United States (8 Cust. Ct. 209, C. D. 607). The claim that they are dutiable at 35 percent ad valorem under paragraph 353 as parts of articles having as an essential feature an electrical element or device, such as signs, was therefore sustained.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

9 Cust. Ct. 458, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/protest-944414-g-of-new-york-mdse-co-cusc-1942.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack