Protest 943046-G of New York Mdse. Co.
This text of 10 Cust. Ct. 376 (Protest 943046-G of New York Mdse. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion by
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the brass base shells are similar to those the subject of New York Merchandise Co., Inc. v. United States (8 Cust. Ct. 209, C. D. 607) they were held dutiable at 35 percent under paragraph 353 as parts of articles having as an essential feature an electrical element or device, such as signs. It was further stipulated that the tape measures in question are the same as those the subject of Abstract 43372 and the atomizers are the same in all material respects as those the subject of Rice Co. v. United States (T. D. 49373). The tape measures and atomizers were therefore held dutiable as household utensils at 40 percent under paragraph 339 as claimed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
10 Cust. Ct. 376, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/protest-943046-g-of-new-york-mdse-co-cusc-1943.