Protest 942682-G of De Pompei
2 Cust. Ct. 620
This text of 2 Cust. Ct. 620 (Protest 942682-G of De Pompei) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Protest 942682-G of De Pompei, 2 Cust. Ct. 620 (cusc 1939).
Opinion
Opinion by
On the record it was held that the wine press in question is manifestly a mechanical contrivance for utilizing and applying energy or force and is not an article having as an essential feature an electrical element or device. The claim at 27½ percent under paragraph 372 was therefore sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Acrow, Inc. v. United States
32 Cust. Ct. 356 (U.S. Customs Court, 1953)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
2 Cust. Ct. 620, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/protest-942682-g-of-de-pompei-cusc-1939.