Protest 942682-G of De Pompei
2 Cust. Ct. 620
Opinion
Opinion by
On the record it was held that the wine press in question is manifestly a mechanical contrivance for utilizing and applying energy or force and is not an article having as an essential feature an electrical element or device. The claim at 27½ percent under paragraph 372 was therefore sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Protest 942682-G of De Pompei, 2 Cust. Ct. 620 (cusc 1939).
2 Cust. Ct. 620 (Protest 942682-G of De Pompei) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Acrow, Inc. v. United States
32 Cust. Ct. 356 (U.S. Customs Court, 1953)