Protest 939471-G of L. Oppleman, Inc.
11 Cust. Ct. 272
This text of 11 Cust. Ct. 272 (Protest 939471-G of L. Oppleman, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Protest 939471-G of L. Oppleman, Inc., 11 Cust. Ct. 272 (cusc 1943).
Opinion
Opinion by
The record showed that the dynamo cycle lamps are of the same kind as those involved in Wedemeyer v. United States (7 Cust. Ct. 141, C. D. 556). The claim appearing to be well-founded, the lamps were held dutiable at 30 percent under paragraph 371.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Wedemeyer v. United States
7 Cust. Ct. 141 (U.S. Customs Court, 1941)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
11 Cust. Ct. 272, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/protest-939471-g-of-l-oppleman-inc-cusc-1943.