Protest 938619-G of La Manna, Azema & Farnan, Inc.

U.S. Customs Court

Protest 938619-G of La Manna, Azema & Farnan, Inc.

1 Cust. Ct. 468

United States Customs Court·Decided November 3, 1938·No. No. 39756·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Cline, J.

The olive oil in question was imported in drums which were marked with the word “Bordeaux.” This marking was held not sufficient to indicate the country of origin and not in accordance with the Customs Regulations of 1931 as amended in T. D. 46978. The protest was therefore overruled. Mitsui v. United States (T. D. 49357) and Abstracts 36282, 36751, 36752, and 36804 cited.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Cline, J.

The olive oil in question was imported in drums which were marked with the word “Bordeaux.” This marking was held not sufficient to indicate the country of origin and not in accordance with the Customs Regulations of 1931 as amended in T. D. 46978. The protest was therefore overruled. Mitsui v. United States (T. D. 49357) and Abstracts 36282, 36751, 36752, and 36804 cited.

Protest 938619-G of La Manna, Azema & Farnan, Inc., 1 Cust. Ct. 468 (cusc 1938).

Pincite

1 Cust. Ct. 468 (Protest 938619-G of La Manna, Azema & Farnan, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.